Has anybody who was using Foxweb 1.x and upgraded ever tested the speed comparison between mergetxt and the fwx approach used in the newer versions?

 

We are in the midst of upgrading from 1.x .  I was working on replacing the mergetxt with something faster, mergetxt seems to be fairly slow with large pages.  I have been able to replace it with hand-coded replacements and in some cases they were as much as 30-40 x faster.

 

If the fwx approach is significantly faster already though, I could just switch to that and save myself a lot of work

 

Thanks for any responses